+160.9%
MMM vs EBAY
+218.6%
-57.7%
-18.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.1% | +0.7% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.6% | +1.8% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +14.4% | +3.2% | +11.2% | +14.0% |
| 3M | +1.8% | +17.8% | -16.0% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +31.3% | +9.5% | +21.8% | +29.3% |
| YTD | +18.0% | +39.2% | -21.2% | +11.5% |
| 1Y | +10.9% | +38.6% | -27.7% | +4.8% |
| All | +160.9% | +218.6% | -57.7% | +97.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling