+104.9%
MMM vs DECK
-3.0%
+107.9%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +1.6% | -1.4% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -3.3% | -2.2% | -1.1% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -13.6% | +6.6% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +10.8% | -21.2% | +32.1% | +15.2% |
| 6M | +5.8% | -21.1% | +26.9% | +9.7% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -17.2% | +24.0% | +9.5% |
| 1Y | +10.4% | -30.7% | +41.1% | +16.2% |
| All | +104.9% | -3.0% | +107.9% | +111.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling