+18.5%
MLM vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+118.5%
-28.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.7% | +4.9% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -8.0% | +5.1% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -27.9% | +21.1% | -6.8% |
| 3M | -11.2% | -74.6% | +63.3% | -11.2% |
| 6M | -21.8% | -99.5% | +77.6% | -20.7% |
| YTD | -17.0% | -99.7% | +82.8% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -16.4% | -99.9% | +83.5% | -14.9% |
| All | +18.5% | -100.0% | +118.5% | +21.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling