+16.5%
MLM vs BBIO
+167.2%
-150.7%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.8% | -3.5% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -0.5% | -2.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -8.3% | -10.1% | +1.8% | -7.3% |
| 3M | -12.0% | +12.4% | -24.4% | -13.3% |
| 6M | -17.6% | +15.9% | -33.5% | -19.3% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -0.5% | -18.3% | -19.5% |
| 1Y | -17.6% | +42.2% | -59.9% | -21.8% |
| All | +16.5% | +167.2% | -150.7% | -1.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling