+216.4%
MKSI vs HTZ
-82.4%
+298.8%
-60.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.0% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +12.2% | -8.5% | +20.7% | +13.1% |
| 30D | -8.0% | -18.9% | +10.9% | -6.5% |
| 3M | -29.5% | -36.0% | +6.5% | -26.8% |
| 6M | -31.9% | -74.6% | +42.7% | -23.6% |
| YTD | +35.3% | -70.8% | +106.1% | +48.2% |
| 1Y | +50.3% | -75.3% | +125.6% | +67.1% |
| 3Y | +216.4% | -81.6% | +298.0% | +272.9% |
| All | +216.4% | -82.4% | +298.8% | +272.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling