-15.4%
MKC vs UMAC
+508.0%
-523.4%
-44.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -6.4% | +5.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -4.3% | +3.3% | -7.6% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -10.4% | +7.3% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +6.8% | +1.8% | +5.1% | +7.0% |
| 6M | -18.3% | +40.7% | -59.1% | -18.1% |
| YTD | -23.1% | +90.9% | -113.9% | -22.9% |
| 1Y | -23.7% | +151.8% | -175.4% | -23.8% |
| All | -15.4% | +508.0% | -523.4% | -19.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling