-29.7%
MKC vs ACGL
+35.2%
-64.9%
-44.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -5.9% | -0.7% | -5.1% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| 3M | +12.7% | +11.0% | +1.7% | +9.9% |
| 6M | -19.3% | -0.3% | -19.0% | -19.4% |
| YTD | -22.2% | +2.3% | -24.4% | -22.8% |
| 1Y | -23.3% | +6.4% | -29.7% | -24.7% |
| All | -29.7% | +35.2% | -64.9% | -34.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling