+64.3%
MITK vs VOO
+77.8%
-13.4%
-52.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -0.4% | -1.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +0.1% | -1.6% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +8.4% | +0.1% | +8.3% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +16.6% | +2.0% | +14.6% | +14.5% |
| 6M | +22.3% | +13.0% | +9.2% | +6.6% |
| YTD | +76.0% | +13.6% | +62.4% | +53.4% |
| 1Y | +92.2% | +20.1% | +72.2% | +57.6% |
| All | +64.3% | +77.8% | -13.4% | -12.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling