+107.3%
META vs ABCL
+104.5%
+2.8%
-34.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -1.2% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +6.7% | +0.7% | +6.0% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +4.8% | +93.1% | -88.3% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -1.6% | +79.4% | -81.1% | -5.8% |
| 6M | -7.5% | +214.9% | -222.3% | -15.6% |
| YTD | -6.4% | +234.2% | -240.6% | -15.4% |
| 1Y | -17.3% | +174.8% | -192.1% | -24.5% |
| All | +107.3% | +104.5% | +2.8% | +77.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling