+65.0%
MET vs TRGP
+261.7%
-196.8%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -1.0% | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +9.5% | -10.8% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +12.5% | +10.8% | +1.7% | +8.4% |
| 6M | +37.1% | +25.3% | +11.8% | +26.0% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +60.3% | -36.5% | +3.7% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | +84.6% | -60.4% | -2.2% |
| All | +65.0% | +261.7% | -196.8% | +9.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling