+65.0%
MET vs SPXS
-79.5%
+144.4%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +1.4% | -1.3% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.2% | -2.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +5.2% | -6.6% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +12.5% | -9.2% | +21.7% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +37.1% | -29.6% | +66.7% | +23.5% |
| YTD | +23.8% | -27.6% | +51.4% | +13.2% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | -36.7% | +60.9% | +9.2% |
| All | +65.0% | -79.5% | +144.4% | +13.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling