+53.4%
MET vs NXT
+178.8%
-125.4%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.2% | -2.8% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -1.1% | +2.3% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -15.3% | +16.8% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +17.7% | -43.8% | +61.5% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +35.0% | -18.7% | +53.6% | +35.0% |
| YTD | +26.3% | -3.0% | +29.3% | +24.9% |
| 1Y | +22.8% | +22.7% | +0.1% | +19.5% |
| 3Y | +65.9% | +95.9% | -30.0% | +55.1% |
| All | +53.4% | +178.8% | -125.4% | +36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling