+66.8%
MET vs NVT
+178.0%
-111.1%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -2.1% | +3.3% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -2.5% | +2.0% | -4.5% | -2.9% |
| 30D | 0.0% | -7.2% | +7.2% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +13.1% | -0.9% | +14.0% | +11.9% |
| 6M | +39.0% | +42.6% | -3.6% | +24.0% |
| YTD | +25.2% | +52.9% | -27.7% | +9.2% |
| 1Y | +25.6% | +64.5% | -38.8% | +6.5% |
| All | +66.8% | +178.0% | -111.1% | +10.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling