+70.0%
MET vs NIO
-62.6%
+132.6%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.6% | -0.1% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -13.0% | +14.2% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -18.3% | +19.7% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +17.7% | -33.2% | +50.9% | +19.7% |
| 6M | +35.0% | -21.5% | +56.5% | +35.8% |
| YTD | +26.3% | -25.5% | +51.8% | +27.3% |
| 1Y | +22.8% | -38.0% | +60.8% | +24.5% |
| All | +70.0% | -62.6% | +132.6% | +72.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling