+85.7%
MET vs LNG
+211.7%
-126.0%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.5% | +11.3% | -6.9% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +10.6% | -7.1% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +5.9% | +16.1% | -10.2% | +1.7% |
| 6M | +33.1% | +29.6% | +3.5% | +24.1% |
| YTD | +33.6% | +60.3% | -26.8% | +16.5% |
| 1Y | +32.7% | +46.1% | -13.4% | +18.5% |
| 3Y | +85.0% | +85.9% | -0.9% | +55.1% |
| All | +85.7% | +211.7% | -126.0% | +34.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling