+32.7%
MET vs LDOS
-31.9%
+64.6%
-17.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.4% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -1.6% | +6.1% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +8.2% | -4.7% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +5.9% | -8.2% | +14.1% | +6.5% |
| 6M | +33.1% | +5.8% | +27.2% | +31.0% |
| YTD | +33.6% | -27.0% | +60.5% | +30.4% |
| 1Y | +32.7% | -31.0% | +63.7% | +33.2% |
| All | +32.7% | -31.9% | +64.6% | +33.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling