+32.7%
MET vs GLDM
-8.0%
+40.7%
-17.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +0.1% | +0.6% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -4.6% | +9.1% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -5.5% | +9.0% | +3.9% |
| 3M | +5.9% | -10.9% | +16.8% | +6.6% |
| 6M | +33.1% | -17.3% | +50.4% | +33.9% |
| YTD | +33.6% | -10.2% | +43.7% | +27.5% |
| 1Y | +32.7% | -6.9% | +39.6% | +20.7% |
| All | +32.7% | -8.0% | +40.7% | +20.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling