+81.5%
MET vs FN
+80.0%
+1.5%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -14.2% | +11.2% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -16.0% | +15.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +3.3% | -40.1% | +43.4% | +6.5% |
| 3M | +4.2% | -43.9% | +48.1% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +27.3% | -55.6% | +83.0% | +33.1% |
| YTD | +29.8% | -35.7% | +65.5% | +29.1% |
| 1Y | +30.2% | -39.8% | +70.1% | +30.2% |
| All | +81.5% | +80.0% | +1.5% | +48.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling