+65.0%
MET vs AIG
+33.4%
+31.6%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +0.5% | -0.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.4% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -3.3% | +1.9% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +12.5% | +2.2% | +10.3% | +10.9% |
| 6M | +37.1% | -2.1% | +39.2% | +38.5% |
| YTD | +23.8% | -11.2% | +35.0% | +33.0% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | -2.1% | +26.2% | +23.8% |
| All | +65.0% | +33.4% | +31.6% | +29.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling