+31.9%
MELI vs NIO
-64.4%
+96.3%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -2.4% | -0.2% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -4.1% | -2.3% | -6.3% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -23.2% | +26.1% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +14.3% | -29.9% | +44.3% | +16.6% |
| 6M | +6.0% | -25.1% | +31.1% | +7.2% |
| YTD | -6.8% | -27.5% | +20.6% | -5.8% |
| 1Y | -20.9% | -41.1% | +20.2% | -19.0% |
| All | +31.9% | -64.4% | +96.3% | +38.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling