+24.2%
MDT vs LH
+56.3%
-32.1%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -4.4% | +4.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -7.4% | +5.8% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +1.0% | -4.6% | +5.6% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +15.2% | +14.5% | +0.7% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +3.7% | +14.8% | -11.1% | -1.6% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +23.3% | -26.2% | -10.2% |
| 1Y | +2.5% | +13.6% | -11.1% | -2.8% |
| All | +24.2% | +56.3% | -32.1% | +5.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling