+33.5%
MDT vs ACGL
+13.9%
+19.6%
-8.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -3.0% | +0.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +0.9% | +4.6% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +19.1% | +13.7% | +5.3% | +10.3% |
| 3M | +19.5% | +8.0% | +11.4% | +14.0% |
| 6M | +33.5% | +13.3% | +20.2% | +27.3% |
| All | +33.5% | +13.9% | +19.6% | +27.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling