+5.3%
MDLZ vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+105.3%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +1.4% | -1.1% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.4% | -2.4% | -1.0% |
| 30D | +7.9% | -29.9% | +37.8% | +8.0% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -54.9% | +63.8% | +9.0% |
| 6M | +10.5% | -99.7% | +110.1% | +12.3% |
| YTD | +27.1% | -99.9% | +127.0% | +29.4% |
| 1Y | +20.9% | -99.9% | +120.8% | +23.3% |
| All | +5.3% | -100.0% | +105.3% | +6.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling