+8.6%
MDLZ vs PCG
-20.4%
+28.9%
-10.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.0% | +0.8% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -1.6% | +3.3% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +11.2% | +1.4% | +9.8% | +11.1% |
| 3M | +6.1% | -23.4% | +29.5% | +8.2% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -19.4% | +27.9% | +10.3% |
| All | +8.6% | -20.4% | +28.9% | +10.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling