+4.1%
MDLZ vs NTRA
+92.9%
-88.8%
-18.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.9% | -0.9% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +0.2% | +1.7% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +0.4% | +4.1% | -3.7% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -0.6% | +50.0% | -50.7% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +14.7% | +67.3% | -52.6% | +18.5% |
| YTD | +18.0% | +43.6% | -25.6% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +4.1% | +89.2% | -85.1% | +7.0% |
| All | +4.1% | +92.9% | -88.8% | +7.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling