+16.5%
MDLZ vs LDOS
+43.9%
-27.4%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +0.5% | -0.8% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -5.4% | +3.7% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -2.1% | +4.9% | -7.0% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +1.3% | +7.2% | -5.9% | +0.4% |
| 6M | +6.2% | -24.2% | +30.4% | +8.9% |
| YTD | +15.8% | -25.8% | +41.6% | +18.6% |
| 1Y | +4.1% | -24.7% | +28.8% | +6.4% |
| 3Y | -4.1% | +39.3% | -43.4% | -13.1% |
| All | +16.5% | +43.9% | -27.4% | +4.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling