+5.3%
MDLZ vs GIS
-38.8%
+44.0%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.8% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +1.5% | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +10.1% | +9.2% | +1.0% | +4.8% |
| 3M | +9.1% | -5.4% | +14.5% | +11.8% |
| 6M | +10.0% | +3.4% | +6.6% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +26.8% | -20.5% | +47.3% | +43.2% |
| 1Y | +22.5% | -20.0% | +42.5% | +37.6% |
| 3Y | +5.3% | -38.6% | +43.9% | +39.1% |
| All | +5.3% | -38.8% | +44.0% | +39.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling