-4.5%
MDLZ vs ECHO
+388.0%
-392.6%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | 0.0% | -0.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.7% | +3.4% | -5.1% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -2.1% | +2.4% | -4.5% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +1.3% | -28.0% | +29.3% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +6.2% | -21.2% | +27.4% | +6.4% |
| YTD | +15.8% | -17.4% | +33.2% | +15.9% |
| 1Y | +4.1% | +33.6% | -29.5% | +3.8% |
| All | -4.5% | +388.0% | -392.6% | -8.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling