+3.0%
MDLZ vs CTAS
-0.9%
+3.9%
-18.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.6% |
| 7D | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -1.0% | -0.6% | -1.2% |
| 3M | +0.9% | +15.8% | -14.9% | -3.3% |
| 6M | +7.3% | -1.0% | +8.3% | +7.3% |
| YTD | +16.4% | +7.4% | +9.0% | +13.4% |
| 1Y | +3.0% | -0.1% | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| All | +3.0% | -0.9% | +3.9% | +0.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling