+11.7%
MDLZ vs CLSK
-50.6%
+62.3%
-10.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -2.8% | +4.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +8.0% | -5.7% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +7.9% | -27.9% | +35.9% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +7.3% | -42.3% | +49.5% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -50.0% | +61.7% | +5.2% |
| All | +11.7% | -50.6% | +62.3% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling