-10.5%
MDLZ vs BTSG
+416.6%
-427.1%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.9% | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +2.9% | -2.9% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +1.4% | +0.9% | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| 3M | 0.0% | +1.6% | -1.6% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +9.1% | +46.8% | -37.6% | +8.6% |
| YTD | +17.9% | +65.5% | -47.6% | +17.4% |
| 1Y | +3.2% | +136.2% | -133.0% | +3.0% |
| All | -10.5% | +416.6% | -427.1% | -11.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling