+22.2%
MDLZ vs ALHC
-64.2%
+86.3%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.9% | +1.7% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.7% | +1.6% |
| 30D | +11.2% | -14.2% | +25.3% | +11.5% |
| 3M | +6.1% | -45.1% | +51.3% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -59.5% | +68.1% | +10.5% |
| YTD | +25.8% | -62.8% | +88.7% | +28.1% |
| 1Y | +21.7% | -55.5% | +77.2% | +23.1% |
| 3Y | +5.8% | +25.7% | -19.9% | +0.9% |
| All | +22.2% | -64.2% | +86.3% | +18.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling