+7.1%
MDLZ vs ACGL
+35.5%
-28.4%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.1% | -0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +6.9% | +6.4% | +0.5% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +12.1% | +16.6% | -4.5% | +8.8% |
| 3M | +7.7% | +11.6% | -3.9% | +5.3% |
| 6M | +10.8% | +17.5% | -6.7% | +7.4% |
| YTD | +27.4% | +15.3% | +12.1% | +23.5% |
| 1Y | +23.5% | +26.3% | -2.8% | +17.8% |
| All | +7.1% | +35.5% | -28.4% | +1.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling