+7.1%
MDLZ vs ABCL
+139.9%
-132.8%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -9.4% | +8.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +6.9% | -14.9% | +21.8% | +6.4% |
| 30D | +12.1% | -15.4% | +27.4% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +7.7% | +88.0% | -80.3% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +10.8% | +138.8% | -128.1% | +12.7% |
| YTD | +27.4% | +225.4% | -198.1% | +30.0% |
| 1Y | +23.5% | +137.3% | -113.8% | +26.0% |
| All | +7.1% | +139.9% | -132.8% | +11.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling