+43.2%
MCO vs PPG
-17.4%
+60.6%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +0.4% | +1.2% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -6.2% | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -7.9% | +7.5% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +7.7% | -10.2% | +17.9% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +7.0% | +2.7% | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| YTD | -6.4% | +4.9% | -11.3% | -11.2% |
| 1Y | -7.6% | -3.2% | -4.4% | -8.7% |
| 3Y | +43.2% | -17.0% | +60.2% | +47.5% |
| All | +43.2% | -17.4% | +60.6% | +47.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling