+51.9%
MCO vs ABCL
+206.1%
-154.3%
-24.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.3% | +0.2% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.3% | -0.9% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -0.7% | +10.7% | +9.9% |
| 3M | +7.0% | +33.4% | -26.4% | +5.0% |
| 6M | +13.7% | +137.8% | -124.1% | +7.0% |
| YTD | +0.6% | +264.3% | -263.7% | -8.4% |
| 1Y | +6.2% | +209.2% | -203.0% | -2.4% |
| 3Y | +51.9% | +208.4% | -156.6% | +37.0% |
| All | +51.9% | +206.1% | -154.3% | +37.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling