+110.7%
MCK vs PFGC
+58.8%
+51.9%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.4% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -4.8% | +1.8% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +0.4% | -12.5% | +13.0% | +1.4% |
| 3M | +12.1% | -9.7% | +21.8% | +13.1% |
| 6M | -5.4% | +7.0% | -12.5% | -5.4% |
| YTD | +7.8% | +4.5% | +3.3% | +8.0% |
| 1Y | +22.9% | -11.6% | +34.5% | +24.6% |
| 3Y | +110.7% | +58.5% | +52.2% | +109.6% |
| All | +110.7% | +58.8% | +51.9% | +109.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling