+49.2%
MCK vs HTZ
-72.5%
+121.7%
-7.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +9.3% | -9.6% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -27.4% | +28.4% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +13.0% | -11.4% | +24.3% | +13.2% |
| 3M | +19.9% | -33.1% | +52.9% | +19.8% |
| 6M | +49.2% | -73.5% | +122.7% | +49.7% |
| All | +49.2% | -72.5% | +121.7% | +49.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling