+49.9%
MCK vs EPAM
+74.1%
-24.2%
-7.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -0.4% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +4.0% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +12.9% | +42.3% | -29.4% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +28.9% | +60.7% | -31.8% | +20.1% |
| 6M | +49.9% | +80.5% | -30.6% | +34.9% |
| All | +49.9% | +74.1% | -24.2% | +34.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling