+110.7%
MCK vs ALHC
+143.4%
-32.7%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.2% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -6.9% | +4.0% | -2.8% |
| 30D | +0.4% | -6.7% | +7.2% | +0.5% |
| 3M | +12.1% | -37.7% | +49.8% | +12.7% |
| 6M | -5.4% | -30.0% | +24.5% | -5.5% |
| YTD | +7.8% | -36.2% | +43.9% | +7.8% |
| 1Y | +22.9% | -22.9% | +45.8% | +22.7% |
| 3Y | +110.7% | +138.4% | -27.6% | +117.3% |
| All | +110.7% | +143.4% | -32.7% | +117.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling