-35.5%
MCHP vs TFC
+6.9%
-42.4%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.2% | -1.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +2.3% | +3.4% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -13.4% | +10.8% | -24.2% | -15.3% |
| 3M | -20.1% | -3.8% | -16.4% | -20.1% |
| 6M | -35.5% | +9.6% | -45.1% | -41.8% |
| All | -35.5% | +6.9% | -42.4% | -41.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling