-10.0%
MCHP vs EPAM
-36.8%
+26.8%
-63.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | -1.6% | +7.0% | +5.6% |
| 7D | -19.2% | +9.1% | -28.3% | -20.7% |
| 30D | -18.6% | +38.5% | -57.1% | -24.4% |
| 3M | -26.9% | +61.0% | -87.9% | -34.8% |
| 6M | -37.2% | +58.0% | -95.3% | -44.6% |
| YTD | -1.8% | -23.5% | +21.6% | +10.1% |
| 1Y | +12.1% | -10.5% | +22.7% | +18.1% |
| 3Y | -10.0% | -33.8% | +23.8% | -9.9% |
| All | -10.0% | -36.8% | +26.8% | -9.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling