-2.8%
MCHP vs ENTG
+42.3%
-45.2%
-63.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -3.9% | +2.0% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +5.1% | -7.2% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -8.5% | -2.6% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -18.1% | +6.7% | -24.8% | -24.3% |
| 6M | +10.8% | +17.7% | -7.0% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +14.2% | +63.5% | -49.2% | -24.4% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | +73.6% | -60.1% | -29.9% |
| All | -2.8% | +42.3% | -45.2% | -37.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling