-19.2%
MCHP vs ECHO
-21.0%
+1.8%
-30.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +4.0% | -5.1% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +8.6% | -5.8% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -12.8% | +3.8% | -16.6% | -14.3% |
| 3M | -19.2% | -19.9% | +0.7% | -18.1% |
| All | -19.2% | -21.0% | +1.8% | -18.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling