-13.2%
MCHP vs DXCM
-13.9%
+0.7%
-63.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +2.4% | -3.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +4.9% | +0.8% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -0.2% | -13.3% | -13.3% |
| 3M | -20.1% | -8.9% | -11.2% | -18.7% |
| 6M | -35.5% | +42.3% | -77.8% | -41.3% |
| YTD | -1.6% | +25.6% | -27.1% | -7.7% |
| 1Y | +15.5% | +39.5% | -24.1% | +5.6% |
| 3Y | -13.2% | -15.3% | +2.1% | -24.7% |
| All | -13.2% | -13.9% | +0.7% | -24.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling