+47.7%
MCHP vs BIYA
-99.8%
+147.5%
-34.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | 0.0% | -1.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -12.8% | -18.7% | +5.9% | -12.7% |
| 3M | -19.2% | -72.0% | +52.8% | -19.6% |
| 6M | +14.5% | -86.4% | +100.9% | +14.1% |
| YTD | +17.1% | -94.2% | +111.3% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +15.3% | -98.4% | +113.7% | +24.0% |
| All | +47.7% | -99.8% | +147.5% | +67.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling