-21.9%
MCD vs ZETA
+71.2%
-93.1%
-21.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -4.1% | +2.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +2.7% | -5.5% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +15.8% | -21.8% | -6.7% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +35.4% | -41.0% | -7.8% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +67.1% | -89.0% | -24.9% |
| All | -21.9% | +71.2% | -93.1% | -24.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling