+111.5%
MCD vs GLDM
+219.0%
-107.4%
-36.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.5% | +3.7% | +2.9% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +11.9% | -0.3% | +12.1% | +11.9% |
| 30D | +20.2% | -1.9% | +22.1% | +20.4% |
| 3M | +5.2% | -0.4% | +5.6% | +5.1% |
| 6M | 0.0% | -10.1% | +10.1% | +0.9% |
| YTD | -6.5% | -5.8% | -0.7% | -6.6% |
| 1Y | -3.9% | +3.1% | -7.0% | -5.0% |
| 3Y | +12.5% | +103.4% | -90.9% | +1.0% |
| 5Y | +24.2% | +125.5% | -101.3% | +9.2% |
| All | +111.5% | +219.0% | -107.4% | +91.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling