-1.5%
MCD vs CFG
+180.9%
-182.4%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -0.1% | -1.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +1.5% | -4.4% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -3.8% | -2.2% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +11.5% | -17.1% | -6.2% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +19.2% | -41.0% | -22.7% |
| YTD | -14.7% | +23.7% | -38.4% | -15.9% |
| 1Y | -17.3% | +38.8% | -56.1% | -19.1% |
| All | -1.5% | +180.9% | -182.4% | -10.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling