+141.7%
MARA vs XLC
+143.7%
-2.1%
-95.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.2% | -1.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -0.8% | +6.8% | +7.8% |
| 30D | +0.6% | +1.0% | -0.4% | -2.3% |
| 3M | -18.5% | -0.7% | -17.8% | -20.1% |
| 6M | +21.7% | -5.1% | +26.9% | +30.9% |
| YTD | +25.9% | -4.3% | +30.2% | +32.4% |
| 1Y | -25.1% | -0.6% | -24.6% | -26.0% |
| 3Y | -5.7% | +72.7% | -78.4% | -64.9% |
| 5Y | -73.9% | +38.0% | -111.9% | -83.6% |
| All | +141.7% | +143.7% | -2.1% | -25.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling